Your precedent becomes their product
General platforms reserve the right to learn from what you submit. Your motion practice sharpens a model opposing counsel can rent next month.
Models tune on your precedent alone, inside your walls.
Sovrant builds AI systems that run entirely inside your firm’s firewall — hardened open-source models, private retrieval across your precedent, and deterministic agents for litigation work. Your casework trains no one.
Every generic AI subscription moves your firm’s thinking into someone else’s custody. The industry calls that convenience. We read the terms of service and call it something else.
General platforms reserve the right to learn from what you submit. Your motion practice sharpens a model opposing counsel can rent next month.
Models tune on your precedent alone, inside your walls.
Text crossing a vendor API sits in their custody, on their retention schedule, subject to their subpoena response — not yours.
Custody never transfers, so privilege never has to be argued.
Rented AI cites cases that don’t exist, and the sanctions motion lands on your desk rather than the vendor’s.
Verification gates; every citation traceable to source.
Seat licenses scale with headcount, and switching costs compound every year you stay on someone else’s platform.
Buy the infrastructure once and own it like your library.
Same four components. The only difference is which side of your boundary they run on — and that difference is the entire product.
Sovrant: nothing crosses. Models, index, and agents run entirely inside your perimeter, so there is no outbound path to revoke.
AI-native systems built around the way your firm actually litigates — intake through discovery through trial — integrated with the stack you already run.
On-premise, or private cloud your firm holds the keys to. Installed, hardened, and maintained with a standing patch cadence.
Open-source models, security-patched and tuned on your precedent — never on a shared corpus, never on anyone else’s matters.
A retrieval index over your own work product, so answers come from your firm’s memory instead of the open internet.
Deterministic workflows for discovery, review, and drafting — each with defined boundaries and verifiable output.
Three phases, in strict order. Nothing begins before the previous one is signed off.
We map how matters actually move through your practice, audit the data estate, and design the sovereign hosting plan — what runs where, and why.
Custom architecture around your practice areas: the retrieval pipeline, model selection and hardening, agent boundaries, and verification gates.
Secure installation inside your perimeter, SOC 2–aligned controls, and hands-on onboarding for the attorneys and staff who run it daily.
A California Bar–accredited MCLE program that turns attorneys and staff into competent, skeptical operators of modern language models — before those models touch client matters.
Joshua Smith
Founder & Chief Executive
J.D., Regent University School of Law. Litigated medical malpractice before building AI infrastructure — and wrote the Bar-accredited course himself.
Liam Tietjens
Lead AI Architect
Agentic systems and deterministic pipelines. Designs the containerized workflows — and the verification gates that keep them honest.
Tommy Thornton
Strategic Scale Partner
CEO of Automates. Runs the managed-infrastructure channel that keeps firm deployments patched, monitored, and secure.
Tell us about your firm and the matters you’d point this at. You’ll hear back from a person, not a sequence.